Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Edmunds FULL TEST: 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart

  1. #1
    Evo Specialist CRX2EVO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Not CA
    Posts
    3,792

    Edmunds FULL TEST: 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart


  2. #2

    Re: Edmunds FULL TEST: 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart

    basically sucks.... mitsu had a great opportunity to make a great car to battle the WRX and they F'ed up

  3. #3
    Ban Hammer


    drmosh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    SoKal
    Posts
    10,618
    Cars
    Hybrid Power!

    Re: Edmunds FULL TEST: 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart

    It's more like a spec-C, you buy it and mod it...

    Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/crankmosh
    Twitter: @crankmosh
    http://www.facebook.com/SoCalEvo.net
    Please use the REPORT POST feature to report a post, PM does NOT work well
    Voicemail: (714) 367-6668

  4. #4

    Re: Edmunds FULL TEST: 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart

    mrsp- 29,999


    might as well get a X
    MR. CARTER....<br /><br /><br />

  5. #5
    Canyon Racer
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    La Jolla, California, United States
    Posts
    2,173

    Re: Edmunds FULL TEST: 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart

    WEAK....I guess I am sticking to the VIII..

  6. #6
    Evo Specialist CRX2EVO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Not CA
    Posts
    3,792

    Re: Edmunds FULL TEST: 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart

    I'll quote some of the disappointing info:

    At the test track we measured the all-wheel-drive Ralliart's maximum stick to be 0.81g on the skid pad. The last front-wheel-drive Lancer GTS we tested managed to grip better with 0.86g, and that was with all-season tires. The performance of the Ralliart also trailed in the slalom test with a 65.0-mph best to the GTS's 65.5 mph. The Evo GSR posted 0.99g and a blistering 70.7-mph run through the cones. It doesn't add up to an impressive performance by the Ralliart.

    The story doesn't get much better in the braking test, either. The Ralliart, with its two-piston front calipers borrowed from the Outlander SUV, covered 128 feet stopping from 60 mph, whereas the GTS only required 118 feet. The Evo? 112 feet. Tires make a difference, don't they?

  7. #7
    Canyon Racer
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    La Jolla, California, United States
    Posts
    2,173

    Re: Edmunds FULL TEST: 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart

    Wow....seems like the engineering just isn't there..how the heck is the GTS outperforming the RalliArt in those categories?! That design team needs to get fired!

  8. #8
    Evo Specialist CRX2EVO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Not CA
    Posts
    3,792

    Re: Edmunds FULL TEST: 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart

    the numbers aren't that far off from the GTS but for the price difference between the GTS and the Ralliart and again between the Ralliart and the GSR it's harder to swallow

  9. #9

    Re: Edmunds FULL TEST: 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart

    I would LOVE a mitsu rep to explain this car to me...i am beside myself of why they would price up a car...and it be a lower performer than another car they have out?!!?

  10. #10

    Re: Edmunds FULL TEST: 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart

    You can find the video of their review on YouTube. It looked rather sluggish coming off the line in the vid : / ... I guess I will be waiting till the 5SPD version comes out and cost $1500 less.
    <br /><br />1999 GST Spyder

  11. #11

    Re: Edmunds FULL TEST: 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart

    The review was definitely disappointing, would rather save for the MR if I was getting a X.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •